文献　※　■はモレーによる分類（太字は重要文献と思われるもの）

 

■　反差別法を集団間の分配的正義の手段とする議論

・Owen Fiss “Groups and the Equal Protection Clause,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 5 (1976): 107-77.

・Robert Post, “Prejudicial Appearances: The Logic of American Anti Discrimination Law,” California Law Review 88 (2000): 1-40.

 

■　私的な団体の責任

・John Gardner “Liberals and Unlawful Discrimination,”Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1989): 1-22;

・同上“Discrimination as Injustice,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 16 (1996): 353-67.

・Denise Reaume, “Harm and Fault in Discrimination Law: The Transition from Intentional to Adverse Effect Discrimination,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2 (2001): 349-85.

 

■　配慮要求について

・Christine Jolls, “Accommodation Mandates,” Stanford Law Review 53 (2000): 223-306;

・同上、“Anti-Discrimination and Accommodation,” Harvard Law Review 115 (2001): 642-99;

・Samuel R. Bagenstos, “‘Rational Discrimination’, Accommodation and the Politics of (Disability) Civil Rights,” Virginia Law Review 89 (2003): 825-923

・Sharon Rabin-Margalioth, “Anti-Discrimination, Accommodation and Universal Mandates?　Aren't They All the Same?”Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 24 (2003): 111-52.

 

■　差別の不法性について

・Amnon Reichman, “Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract:　Toward a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 14 (2001): 79-132;

 

■　被害者を排除しようとする欲求によって動機づけられているケースはより悪い。

・Larry Alexander, “What Makes Wrongful Discrimination Wrong?” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 149 (1992): 141-219;

・Richard Primus, “Equal Protection and Disparate Impact: Round Three,”Harvard Law Review 117 (2003): 493-587.

・Matt Cavanagh, Against Equality of Opportunity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)

 

■　expressive dimension 

・Deborah Hellman, When Is Discrimination Wrong? (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2008)

・――――　The Expressive Dimension of Equal Protection,” Minnesota Law Review 85 (2000): 1-70

・Elizabeth Anderson and Richard H. Pildes, “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (2000): 1503-75

　（Anderson & Pildes 2000 は、福嶋敏明「法・政府行為の表現的次元とその問題性に関する一考察――アメリカ合衆国における「法の表現理論」をめぐる議論状況」『早稲田法学会誌』第54巻、2004年に紹介・検討あり）